You need to be logged in to like or comment on this article. Click here to login.
May 19, 2015 01:39 AM

Design with uncertainty: the role of future options for infrastructure integration

Decision-making for effective infrastructure integration is challenging because the performance of long-lasting facilities is often difficult to foresee or well beyond the designer’s control. We propose a new approach for integrating the construction/retrofitting of two or more types of facilities. Infrastructure integration has many perceived benefits, but practitioners also express serious doubts, particularly when it comes to civil engineering works. To substantiate this approach we test all of the major options for integrating a ground source heat pump (GSHP) system with the construction/retrofitting of an archetypal office building. We use actual data from the UK, which represents a middle-of-the-road setting among major developed countries. The model highlights the sensitivity of the range of cost-effective solutions to the embedding of future options. The findings point to a clear need for appropriate standards for managing infrastructure integration. We expect this kind of model to find increasing applications among infrastructure complexes, particularly as cities become denser and more multi-functional.

This article has been originally posted on the University of Cambridge's Open Source Research Repository on 2016. The full length article can be viewed here.

Share this:

mcladmin's picture

    Our mission is to build the largest academic worldwide community, bringing together top-notch academics from different cultures and countries, where they can find growth, inspiration, acknowledgement and the best development opportunities in their

    View company